The rest of the jury then begins to persuade the architect that the accused is actually guilty. Each member of. It revolves around the opinions and mindsets of twelve diverse characters that are tasked with pronouncing the guilt or innocence of a young man accused of patricide.
Movies in Theaters
The extraordinary element is that their finding will determine his life or death. This play was made into a movie in , produced by Henry Fonda who played the lead role, Juror 8, and Reginald Rose who wrote the original screenplay. Introduction 12 Angry Men is one of the most acclaimed feature films of all time. Additionally, this film was listed on the university syllabus as one of three films to see in regard to this course, Management — Contexts. While the trial is not depicted in the film, the jury deliberations are the central focus and examine several aspects of organization change and the obstacles that must be overcome in order to come to a unanimous agreement over the guilt or innocence of the accused.
The events shown in the movie can be scientifically explained using concepts of organisational behaviour. Although some of these concepts did not even exist by the time the movie was made, the movie still is an excellent case to study and illustrate them. The reason for this. Sidney Lumet. Orion-Nova, Film and discuss the implications of your findings for decision making in a business organisation. Juror 9, seeing Juror 4 rub his nose which is being irritated by his glasses , realizes that the woman who allegedly saw the murder had impressions in the sides of her nose, indicating that she wore glasses, but did not wear them in court out of vanity.
Other jurors, including Juror 4, confirm that they saw the same thing. Juror 8 adds that she would not have been wearing them while trying to sleep and points out that on her own evidence, the attack happened so swiftly that she wouldn't have had time to put them on. Jurors 12, 10, and 4 change their vote to "not guilty", leaving only Juror 3. Juror 3 gives a long and increasingly tortured string of arguments, building on earlier remarks that his relationship with his own son is deeply strained, which is ultimately why he wants the boy to be guilty.
He finally loses his temper and tears up a photo of him and his son, but then breaks down crying and changes his vote to "not guilty", making the vote unanimous. The jurors then leave the room to reveal their verdict to the court. Outside, Jurors 8 Davis and 9 McCardle exchange names and all of the jurors descend the courthouse steps to return to their individual lives.
A complete kinescope of that performance, which had been missing for years and was feared lost, was discovered in The success of the television production resulted in a film adaptation. Sidney Lumet , whose prior directorial credits included dramas for television productions such as The Alcoa Hour and Studio One , was recruited by Henry Fonda and Rose to direct. Fonda later stated that he would never again produce a film. At the beginning of the film, the cameras are positioned above eye level and mounted with wide-angle lenses to give the appearance of greater depth between subjects, but as the film progresses the focal length of the lenses is gradually increased.
By the end of the film, nearly everyone is shown in closeup using telephoto lenses from a lower angle, which decreases or "shortens" depth of field. Lumet stated that his intention in using these techniques with cinematographer Boris Kaufman was to create a nearly palpable claustrophobia.
On its first release, 12 Angry Men received critical acclaim. Weiler of The New York Times wrote "It makes for taut, absorbing, and compelling drama that reaches far beyond the close confines of its jury room setting. The film is today viewed as a classic, highly regarded from both a critical and popular viewpoint: Roger Ebert listed it as one of his "Great Movies". AFI also named 12 Angry Men the 42nd most inspiring film , the 88th most heart-pounding film and the 87th best film of the past hundred years.
Read e-book Twelve Angry Men () by Sidney Lumet - an Analysis
The film was also nominated for the movies list in American Film Institute lists:. It lost to the movie The Bridge on the River Kwai in all three categories.
Speaking at a screening of the film during the Fordham University Law School Film festival, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor stated that seeing 12 Angry Men while she was in college influenced her decision to pursue a career in law. She was particularly inspired by immigrant Juror 11's monologue on his reverence for the American justice system.
- e-book Twelve Angry Men () by Sidney Lumet - an Analysis.
- Twelve Angry Men (1957) by Sidney Lumet--an Analysis?
- Navigation menu.
- Spur of the Moment (Oberon Modern Plays).
- 1) Introduction;
- Parables, Catholic Apologetics Through Sacred Scripture.
She also told the audience of law students that, as a lower-court judge, she would sometimes instruct juries to not follow the film's example, because most of the jurors' conclusions are based on speculation, not fact. The movie has had a number of adaptations.
The Indian film Ek Ruka Hua Faisla "a pending decision" is a remake of the film, with an almost identical storyline. Russian director Nikita Mikhalkov also made a adaptation, A Chinese adaptation, 12 Citizens , follows the plot of the original American movie while including characters reflecting contemporary Beijing society, including a cab driver, guard, businessman, policeman, a retiree persecuted in a s' political movement, and others.
- 12 Angry Men movie review & film summary () | Roger Ebert.
- "Twelve Angry Men"—a Play by Reginald Rose!
- Lesson Plans Waiting.
The episode flips the film's format and depicts one holdout convincing the jury to convict the privileged defendants of assault against a less well-off victim, despite their lawyers initially convincing 11 jury members of a not guilty verdict. In , a television remake of the film under the same title was released by Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.
The film has also been subject to parody. The American sitcom Happy Days also features a similar story when Howard Cunningham and Fonzie get picked for a jury, with Fonzie being the lone hold-out for innocence and swaying the rest of the jury in the season 5 episode "Fonzie for the Defense". Template:Authority control. Sign In Don't have an account?
Start a Wiki. Add Video. Add Image. Contents [ show ].